We explore the key investment risks and opportunities associated with the gaming industry.

Key Points

  • The gaming industry has a number of social impacts, and the possibility of increasing regulation may have significant implications for gaming companies.
  • While studies have shown that there is not a clear relationship between gaming and violence, there is evidence of a link between the use of loot boxes in games and gambling addiction.
  • As the technology continues to develop, we may see exciting positive developments, such as the growth of the exergames market.

The Gaming Industry

At present, over two billion people play video games worldwide, and this number is likely to exceed three billion by 2023.1 Globally, an estimated 3-4% of gamers are addicted to video games and 8.5% of children aged between 8-18 suffer from gaming disorder, which is the obsessive and compulsive overuse of internet games and video games as an escape from life.2 A 2021 study found that the global prevalence of gaming disorder was 3.05%, suggesting that 60 million people may be affected.3 

Gaming addiction was perceived to have reached such extreme levels in South Korea that in 2011, the government introduced a shutdown rule, which banned children under the age of 16 from gaming between the hours of midnight and 06:00. Ten years after the controversial rule was established, the government decided to abolish the curfew, given the insignificant impact that it had, in addition to the infringement upon family autonomy and the right for a parent or guardian to do what they see fit.

China implemented an even stricter constraint on the use of online video gaming, so that companies could only allow minors to play between 20:00-21:00 on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays. The result of this was a major reduction in the amount of time spent by young people on video games; one of the major videogaming companies in China stated in an earnings report that the amount of time spent by children under 18 on video games had significantly declined after the rule was introduced.

Clearly, regulation of this type can have a major impact on gaming companies and their revenues. We believe, however, that drastic measures such as those seen in South Korea and China are unlikely to be implemented in Western countries. A much more common approach is the use of pop-ups during gameplay which remind players to take breaks, in order to encourage healthy practice. The precise impacts of such an approach are not clear and have not been studied, but are likely to have less influence compared to the regulation in China and South Korea.

Loot Boxes and Gambling

A loot box is a virtual ‘box’ that can be purchased (with real money) in order to receive random items, which can help a player progress in a game. There is evidence to suggest that loot boxes are linked to youth gambling addiction,4 and according to research on the topic, the relationship between loot box use and problem gambling is stronger than previously believed. The similarities between loot boxes and gambling mean that they could be acting as a ‘gateway’ to problem gambling for those that purchase them.5

Loot boxes are highly lucrative, generating approximately $15 billion in sales in 2020 globally.6 This accounts for 11% of yearly gaming revenue and 28% of in-game purchase revenues. However, loot boxes have been the subject of scrutiny in recent years, resulting in new laws and (in some cases) outright bans, given their link to gambling.

In Germany, age restrictions for games with loot boxes have been raised. Gacha games, in which loot boxes are built into the game, have been banned in Japan. In China, gaming companies must disclose the exact items in loot boxes and the probability of obtaining them, as well as limiting the amount of loot boxes that can be purchased in a game. The Netherlands has banned loot boxes where the items have actual market value and can be traded outside of the game. In addition, Belgium has declared them a form of illegal gambling.

We believe that implementation of laws relating to loot boxes in the UK is likely, but that an outright ban is not, given that, after recent consultation, the government has decided against it. In the US, there have been efforts to regulate loot boxes through legislation, and in 2019 the Federal Trade Commission hosted a workshop on the issue. However, the way each state self-regulates means that it is unlikely that we will see a countrywide loot-box intervention. Continuing court cases in the European Union (EU) also suggest that we may see more EU countries implementing laws around loot boxes.

While the measures introduced in many countries may have short-term impacts on the share prices of gaming companies, to have a meaningful long-term effect we think that there would need to be more widespread collective action in place.

Gaming and Violence

Violence is often perceived to be a major social impact of gaming; however, a study by the American Psychological Association (in addition to several others) has indicated that while video games may influence aggression, there is insufficient evidence to suggest they make users more violent. Evidence shows that the aggression that is caused by gaming typically stems from social factors, such as being mocked or losing – the aggression does not generally come from the game displaying violence or mature themes. The effects of violent video games on aggressiveness appear to be relatively short-lived, potentially lasting less than 15 minutes. As a result, we believe this is unlikely to affect sales within the gaming industry.

Benefits of Exergames

Exergames, which encourage the user to engage in physical activity, have been shown to have positive health impacts, including improved balance, flexibility and muscle strength. Studies have also indicated that, compared with traditional exercise, exergames can lead to significantly higher levels of enjoyment. Given that 40-65% of participants drop out of a physical-activity program within the first three to six months, providing a more enjoyable form of exercise with continuously changing aspects has the potential to decrease this dropout rate.

The drawback of this type of video game is that it tends to be expensive, and therefore less accessible to those on lower incomes. Although it may be cheaper than a gym subscription over the long run, the initial layout is costly.

At present, exergames account for roughly only 1% of the gaming market, but this figure is growing.7 With improving technology, exergames may be an exciting area of opportunity, at the same time as providing health benefits to their users.

Tighter Regulation, but More Opportunities

The negative social impacts of gaming, including gaming disorder and gambling, make the industry vulnerable in terms of increasing regulation. While we have seen outright bans introduced in China and South Korea, we think that it is unlikely Western countries will follow. We believe, however, that there is scope for additional laws and intervention which may have significant implications for gaming companies. Nevertheless, we do see potential within the interactive fitness space, where exergames can have a positive impact on users. As the technology develops, we expect this to be a growing area.

We view gaming as an industry where the social impacts, such as addiction, childhood usage and aggression, are widely acknowledged, but where there tends to be less understanding around the risks, the validity of those risks, and the potential investment implications. Given the fast-evolving technology involved in gaming, much of this research is in its early stages and regulatory consequences can only be analyzed through country-specific case studies, often with cultural nuances, which presents further challenges. We believe this is a prime example of where, through active management, we can aim to better understand a material social risk which is in turn factored into our investment decision-making processes, with the intention of being forward rather than backward-looking. This analysis can also inform and enable more detailed engagements on this topic, helping our conversations with companies and our understanding of how risks are managed, to move beyond a high-level view.

Sources:

  1. Number of active video gamers worldwide from 2015 to 2024. Statista. May 17, 2022
  2. Game Quitters. Video Game Addiction Statistics.  Accessed August 15, 2022: https://gamequitters.com/video-game-addiction-statistics/
  3. Ibid.
  4. The Guardian. UK will not ban video games loot boxes despite problem gambling findings.  July 17, 2022.
  5. Zendle, David & Cairns, Paul. Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale survey. PloS one, 13(11). November 21, 2018.
  6. Juniper Research. Video Game Loot Boxes to Generate over $20 Billion in Revenue by 2025. March 9, 2021.
  7. Aili McConnon. Video Game Makers Want to Get Players Off the Couch. February 17, 2020.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell this security, country or sector. Please note that strategy holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice. Newton manages a variety of investment strategies. Whether and how ESG considerations are assessed or integrated into Newton’s strategies depends on the asset classes and/or the particular strategy involved, as well as the research and investment approach of each Newton firm. ESG may not be considered for each individual investment and, where ESG is considered, other attributes of an investment may outweigh ESG considerations when making investment decisions. For additional Important Information, click on the link below.

Important information

Issued by Newton Investment Management North America LLC ("NIMNA" or the "Firm"). NIMNA is a registered investment adviser and subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation ("BNY Mellon"). The Firm was established in 2021, comprised of equity and multi-asset teams from an affiliate, Mellon Investments Corporation. The Firm is part of the group of affiliated companies that individually or collectively provide investment advisory services under the brand "Newton" or "Newton Investment Management" ("Newton"). Newton currently includes NIMNA and Newton Investment Management Ltd. ("Newton Limited").

Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. Statements are correct as of the date of the material only. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate.

Personnel of certain of our BNY Mellon affiliates may act as: (i) registered representatives of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered broker-dealer) to offer securities, (ii) officers of the Bank of New York Mellon (a New York chartered bank) to offer bank-maintained collective investment funds, and (iii) Associated Persons of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered investment adviser) to offer separately managed accounts managed by BNY Mellon Investment Management firms, including NIMNA and (iv) representatives of Newton Americas, a Division of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation, U.S. Distributor of Newton Investment Management North America.

This material is for institutional investors only. This publication or any portion thereof may not be copied or distributed without prior written approval from the firm.

No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment and past performance is no indication of future performance.

Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements.

Information about the indices shown here is provided to allow for comparison of the performance of the strategy to that of certain well-known and widely recognized indices. There is no representation that such index is an appropriate benchmark for such comparison.

Share