We assess the impact of the UK government’s Autumn Statement on the gilt market.

Key points

  • Our view is that the Autumn Statement was broadly a rational, balanced response to recent political and economic volatility.
  • It eases some of the near-term pressure on the UK gilt market, but we think gilts still face some headwinds.
  • We think the back-loading of the spending cuts announced last week is likely to mean that growth generation is problematic during a programme of government austerity.
  • There may be some ‘flight-to-quality’ characteristics of gilt ownership for holders that require sterling-denominated assets, as the growth outlook looks anaemic.
  • We see recent developments, political volatility and worsening debt measures as significant headwinds for gilts, and believe it prudent for global bond investors to maintain an underweight position for now.

Market reaction to UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt’s Autumn Statement on 17 November was muted, primarily because a very good indication of what we could reasonably expect had already been leaked to the press. Our view is that it was broadly a rational, balanced response to circumstances that had worsened sharply following predecessor Kwasi Kwarteng’s late-September ‘mini budget’, and that while it eases some of the near-term pressure on the UK gilt market, gilts still face some headwinds.

Working with the Bank

It was encouraging that emphasis was put on how the government aims to work in tandem with the Bank of England in dealing with the issue of inflation. We believe a key issue with the mini budget was that, while the Bank of England was doing an unconvincing job of fighting ever-increasing inflationary pressures, the mini budget was focused purely on stimulating growth with no consideration for the likely inflationary consequences of such an approach.

The UK growth outlook for 2023 is weak, with the Bank of England expecting a 1.5% fall in GDP over the calendar year and the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicting a 1.4% drop, while some indicators are suggesting that the UK may already be in a recessionary environment.

The spending cuts announced in the chancellor’s Autumn Statement should act as a further drag on these growth prospects, which we believe should take the momentum out of both inflationary pressures and inflationary expectations. We anticipate that this backdrop should shorten the period of inflationary pain, meaning that interest rates should peak at a lower level than previously expected. Given this scenario, why do we still have some reservations about gilts?

Worsening backdrop

Gilts may well look attractive when compared to some other assets at the moment, but UK inflation is still forecast to remain high (the OBR forecast is for a rate of 7.4% next year), and therefore sizeable negative real yields are likely to remain. Moreover, gilt issuance for 2023 and beyond is expected to remain high, and exceptionally so for 2023. The expected gilt issuance for the remainder of 2022 is lower than the Debt Management Office’s (DMO) September expectations, but the total funding requirements for the next fiscal year stand at £305.1bn, which equates to around 11.8% of GDP. This predicament quickly starts to worsen the debt/GDP measures of the UK for the next few years.

Back-loaded spending cuts

Our view is that the back-loading of the spending cuts announced last week is thus likely to mean that growth generation is problematic during a programme of government austerity, and therefore that the GDP element of the debt/GDP equation won’t be able to do any heavy lifting to improve those measures.  

Indeed, the forecasts for debt/GDP have worsened significantly, and the Bank of England’s November 2022 forecast expects it to peak at 97.6% in 2026/27. This is up from the 81% forecast in its March 2022 forecast.

From a domestic point of view, there may be some ‘flight-to-quality’ characteristics of gilt ownership for holders that require sterling-denominated assets, as the growth outlook looks anaemic. This may provide some support for gilts. However, with recent developments, political volatility and worsening debt measures, some participants may remain sceptical about the ‘quality’ aspect of UK government debt.

Attractive alternatives to gilts

To our minds, a larger headwind for the gilt market lies in the fact that there are alternatives. According to the Q1 2022 quarterly report from the DMO, overseas holdings made up 29% of the gilt market – a significant proportion. However, on many of the key measures that investors are looking at to make their investment decisions, such as real yields, nominal yields, debt ratios, debt trajectory and volatility, there are currently similar or higher-rated alternatives which are more attractive against these criteria. Thus, on a near to mid-term view, we believe it prudent for global bond investors to remain underweight gilts and UK government duration.

Authors

Carl Shepherd

Carl Shepherd

Portfolio manager, Fixed Income team

Comments

Your email address will not be published.

Newton does not capture and store any personal information about an individual who accesses this blog, except where he or she volunteers such information, whether via email, an electronic form or other means. Where personal information is supplied, it will be used only in relation to this blog, and will not be collected or stored for any other purpose. Comments submitted via the blog are moderated, and, as a result, there may be a delay before they are posted.

This is a financial promotion. These opinions should not be construed as investment or other advice and are subject to change. This material is for information purposes only. This material is for professional investors only. Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell investments in those securities, countries or sectors. Please note that holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice.

Important information

This material is for Australian wholesale clients only and is not intended for distribution to, nor should it be relied upon by, retail clients. This information has not been prepared to take into account the investment objectives, financial objectives or particular needs of any particular person. Before making an investment decision you should carefully consider, with or without the assistance of a financial adviser, whether such an investment strategy is appropriate in light of your particular investment needs, objectives and financial circumstances.

Newton Investment Management Limited is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence in respect of the financial services it provides to wholesale clients in Australia and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority of the UK under UK laws, which differ from Australian laws.

Newton Investment Management Limited (Newton) is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), 12 Endeavour Square, London, E20 1JN. Newton is providing financial services to wholesale clients in Australia in reliance on ASIC Corporations (Repeal and Transitional) Instrument 2016/396, a copy of which is on the website of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, www.asic.gov.au. The instrument exempts entities that are authorised and regulated in the UK by the FCA, such as Newton, from the need to hold an Australian financial services license under the Corporations Act 2001 for certain financial services provided to Australian wholesale clients on certain conditions. Financial services provided by Newton are regulated by the FCA under the laws and regulatory requirements of the United Kingdom, which are different to the laws applying in Australia.

Explore topics