Investors will recall the old adage that when the U.S. sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold. February’s sell-off kept true to form, with equity markets in Europe, Japan and emerging markets all following the S&P 500 index of U.S. equities down after higher-than-expected U.S. wage growth data raised the specter of rising inflation.
In our view, one of the remarkable things about February’s sell-off was not the return of volatility after its long absence, but rather how far emerging markets stood up to scrutiny and held the line in terms of performance. Their 10.2% decline from peak to trough in January and February almost exactly mirrored the S&P 500, Nikkei 225, FTSE 100 and Euronext 100 indices. In previous sell-offs, emerging markets were often the hardest hit by spikes in volatility, but this time things were different.
One reason for this, we think, is that there have been positive changes across emerging markets since 2013’s ‘taper tantrum’ which serve to shore up emerging economies against external shocks and adverse global financial conditions. These changes include the relative absence of emerging-market/U.S.-dollar currency pegs, reduced foreign debt, lower rates of inflation, lower current-account deficits, and currency adjustments.
Of these, the reduction in U.S.-dollar pegs is possibly the most significant. Historically, negative cycles would follow a well-worn path: confronted with a spike in volatility, an emerging-market country would deploy its foreign-exchange reserves to defend its currency and maintain its U.S.-dollar peg. Eventually, the rate of attrition in these reserves would become unsustainable, forcing a devaluation and the printing of new currency to service existing debt (often denominated in far more expensive U.S. dollars). This, in turn, would lead to a domestic inflationary spiral and finally a default on that U.S.-dollar debt.
Now, with far fewer emerging markets pegging their currencies to the U.S. dollar, and with a surge in local-currency bond issuance, this cycle has been broken. This means that the old correlations of emerging to developed markets are no longer the same, even if they are often still widely assumed.
Beyond currency pegs, though, other factors underline a change in emerging markets. Consider the composition of emerging-market indices, for example. Before the financial crisis in the mid-2000s, energy and materials stocks comprised close to 40% of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. This has now fallen to about 15%, with technology overtaking these sectors, thus reducing the influence of commodity-intensive stocks on the index.
Political risk too offers a changing dynamic. Where once it was perhaps fair to assign a far higher level of political risk to emerging markets, it is our belief that something of an equalization of political risk is being seen in select developed markets. Nevertheless, emerging markets still trade at a wide discount to their developed counterparts, with a cyclically-adjusted Shiller (10-year average) price-to-earnings ratio of just 13x, versus the U.S. equivalent of 24x.
Even if investors haven’t fully woken up to it yet, we think these factors add up to a new reality. Increasingly, we believe, emerging capital markets can thrive on their own terms with far less reference to the S&P 500 or other developed capital markets, so long as the real economies remain supported. For now, this seems to be the case. During four out of the last six U.S. rate-rise cycles, for example, emerging markets have continued to rise.
Looking to the future, we remain optimistic about emerging markets, although we acknowledge how differentiated the opportunity set is at the individual country, sector and stock levels. For now, we see interesting opportunities in areas such as health care, e-commerce and sectors related to electric vehicles, as we maintain a focus on companies offering solid operating cash flows over a five-year period, and sustainable balance sheets.
Overall, we continue to see strong structural growth stories in emerging markets, underpinned by structural thematic trends, which we believe are not too vulnerable to derailment by changes in equity-market sentiment or headline macroeconomic data.
 Source: Bloomberg, based on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, U.S.-dollar terms, January 26-February 9, 2018. All other indices in U.S.-dollar terms.
 Well over 80% of total outstanding emerging-market debt is denominated in local currencies. Source: Business Insider: ‘Global debt has hit an eye-watering $215 trillion’, April 5, 2017.
 Source: Newton, as at March 14, 2018.
 Source: Bloomberg, March 2018
This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only. Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell this security, country or sector. Please note that strategy holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice. Compared to more established economies, the value of investments in emerging markets may be subject to greater volatility, owing to differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic, political instability or less developed market practices.
This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only.
‘Newton’ and/or the “Newton Investment Management” brand refers to the following group of affiliated companies: Newton Investment Management Limited and Newton Investment Management (North America) Limited (NIMNA Ltd). In the UK, NIMNA Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the conduct of investment business and is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Registered in England no. 2675952. NIMNA Ltd is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. NIMNA Ltd’s investment business is described in Form ADV, Part 1 and 2, which can be obtained from the SEC.gov website or obtained upon request.
Personnel of certain of our BNY Mellon affiliates may act as: (i) registered representatives of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered broker-dealer) to offer securities, (ii) officers of the Bank of New York Mellon (a New York chartered bank) to offer bank-maintained collective investment funds, and (iii) Associated Persons of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered investment adviser) to offer separately managed accounts managed by BNY Mellon Investment Management firms, including NIMNA Ltd.
Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but their accuracy is not guaranteed. Unless you are notified to the contrary, the products and services mentioned are not insured by the FDIC (or by any governmental entity) and are not guaranteed by or obligations of The Bank of New York or any of its affiliates. The Bank of New York assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the above data and disclaims all expressed or implied warranties in connection therewith. © 2006 The Bank of New York Company, Inc. All rights reserved.