This week UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson stirred controversy by gaining the approval of HM Queen Elizabeth to ‘prorogue’ the British Parliament. This will effectively curtail Parliament’s current session, which is the longest for nearly 400 years, in mid-September. There will then be a period of recess, nominally to prepare a new Queen’s Speech (legislative program), which will be presented at a state opening of Parliament on October 14. The UK government stated that this was intended to refresh the statutory timetable in order to incorporate Mr. Johnson’s pledges for a new domestic agenda and revised spending plans.

Constitutional Outrage?

Although a new Queen’s Speech is not controversial – and most new prime ministers like to set the legislative stage in this way – the timing of this action has provoked outrage among much of the political class at Westminster and in some quarters across the UK. This is because rumored plans to seize control of Parliamentary business by a group of opposition members of Parliament determined to prevent a so-called ‘no-deal’  Brexit – not to mention similar, if uncoordinated, attempts to do the same thing by some of Mr. Johnson’s own Conservative MPs – could effectively be scuppered by a lack of parliamentary time. Any such legislation would require debate, voting and referral to the upper House of Lords; and this suspension of both Houses would render this difficult. John Bercow, the Speaker of the House, in an unprecedented constitutionally unconventional public intervention, branded this action an ‘outrage’. Such sentiments were echoed in protests in Westminster, in the press and across social media.

Legal Challenge

Defendants of the action would state that not only was it constitutionally legal, but that the bulk of the backlash came from the so-called ‘remain’ contingent of those wishing to remain in the European Union (EU). They would also point out that seeking to prevent a ‘no-deal’ Brexit would bind the hands of Mr. Johnson and his government in their negotiations with the EU in the run-up to the Brexit deadline on October 31. It is Mr. Johnson’s contention that leaving the possibility of ‘no deal’ on the table is an essential negotiating tool in reaching a mutually agreeable arrangement with the EU ahead of the subsequent trade negotiations. His detractors claim that the prime minister is, in fact, seeking actively to achieve a ‘no-deal’ outcome. Moreover, some are suggesting that he is looking to move closer to President Donald Trump. Legal challenges to the ‘prorogation’ have been launched although their chances of success are uncertain.

Sterling, sensing more news flow volatility, sold off sharply on the news. Our investment policy in the UK continues to favor cash flow-generative companies with significant overseas exposure, which we expect therefore to benefit from a weak currency. 

This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only.

Important information

This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only.

‘Newton’ and/or the “Newton Investment Management” brand refers to the following group of affiliated companies: Newton Investment Management Limited and Newton Investment Management (North America) Limited (NIMNA Ltd). In the UK, NIMNA Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the conduct of investment business and is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Registered in England no. 2675952. NIMNA Ltd is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. NIMNA Ltd’s investment business is described in Form ADV, Part 1 and 2, which can be obtained from the SEC.gov website or obtained upon request.

Personnel of certain of our BNY Mellon affiliates may act as: (i) registered representatives of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered broker-dealer) to offer securities, (ii) officers of the Bank of New York Mellon (a New York chartered bank) to offer bank-maintained collective investment funds, and (iii) Associated Persons of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered investment adviser) to offer separately managed accounts managed by BNY Mellon Investment Management firms, including NIMNA Ltd.

Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but their accuracy is not guaranteed. Unless you are notified to the contrary, the products and services mentioned are not insured by the FDIC (or by any governmental entity) and are not guaranteed by or obligations of The Bank of New York or any of its affiliates. The Bank of New York assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the above data and disclaims all expressed or implied warranties in connection therewith. © 2006 The Bank of New York Company, Inc. All rights reserved.

Share