Governments around the world are preparing to mount an attack on fake news as they wake up to the seriousness of public opinion being manipulated. But what is the relevance for investors and how can we tackle this insidious force?

Defined as ‘the promotion and propagation of news articles via social media’, fake news stories are made to look as though they are spread by other readers, as opposed to being paid-for advertising.[1]

The topic may be receiving a lot of attention now, but you could say fake news is propaganda in a 21st century costume, and that only the platform of distribution has changed. A few centuries ago the printing press was similarly revolutionary, but it is the speed and reach of the internet that has allowed fake news to become so voracious.

The practice received intensified interest in the aftermath of the 2016 U.S. election amid allegations that hackers attempted to affect the result through the dissemination of anti-Hilary Clinton content. Concerns have also been voiced that voters in the European Union (EU)/UK Referendum may have been influenced by malevolent forces pushing pro-Brexit articles on social media platforms.

 

Who’s next?

Attention then inevitably turned to the full calendar of European elections in 2017 and how they might similarly be manipulated. The dampening of the right-wing, anti-establishment upswing – seen in the results of the Dutch and French elections earlier this year – appears to have gone some way to allay these fears, although there are still concerns that the French election was targeted.

With Chancellor Merkel next on the blocks in Germany, there may be concern that foreign interference might intensify once more. Against this backdrop, we tend to avoid traditional news publishing firms, and we struggle to see a future in which their business models are not compromised.

So what are governments doing about it?

In the UK, a ‘fake news’ inquiry was launched by the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on 30 January this year. Meanwhile, in June, Singapore’s home affairs and law minister announced that the country was looking to legislate to tackle fake news in 2018.[2] The EU and certain individual European governments have also placed the topic firmly on the agenda.

 

Public opinion

Part of the motivation for governments is the growing level of distrust of news outlets. For example, a study of 1,000 Britons found only 20% of UK news audiences felt confident the news they were reading was real. At the same time, 70% wanted social media companies to take more responsibility for tackling fake news.[3] In Singapore, a survey showed 91% of Singaporeans supported stronger laws to weed out the practice.[4]

This is worrisome, but it would arguably be worse if consumers were not skeptical of the content they read as it becomes increasingly difficult to access completely non-biased reporting.

For this reason, social media companies inevitably have a role to play, and a report from TrendLab, ‘Fake news and cyber propaganda: The use and abuse of social media’, suggests they will be encompassed in any new regulations implemented by governments.

The report continues: “This would make fake news very bad for business indeed, and so they are taking steps to fight it. These include the suspension of bot/suspicious accounts, the addition of features to allow users to report fake news, and the hiring of more personnel to help deal with these reports.”

 

Comfort zone

Algorithms designed to make social media users feel good can create what has become known as an ‘echo chamber’ in which only articles that reinforce people’s beliefs are promoted. This is because sites want to generate more traffic and engagement, so they promote news more likely to make you reach for the ‘like’ button or that you will share with followers.

In investing, we think the same kinds of echo chambers can be formed. This may be especially concerning for those investment professionals who trade aggressively and pay a lot of attention to news flow, or for funds that have algorithms and robots crawling the internet for key trigger words. Here the issue of perception (and what U.S. Counsellor to President Trump, Kellyanne Conway, would term ‘alternative facts’) is important.

On the other hand, if you have taken the view that trying to trade on short-term, specific noise is a bit of a ‘mug’s game’ in any case (as we have at Newton), then the fake news phenomenon is far less important.

 

Verification of ‘facts’ in investing

We are as focused as ever on verifying information and cross-checking ‘facts’, which is when our bench of sector analysts come into their own. Today there is a proliferation of information, a good portion of which may be unreliable. We believe this increases the premium on trustworthy and quality providers of information, and on those who can interpret it.

The changing nature of news generation and consumption – which has been accelerated by the online journalism model – and the proliferation of fake news and alternative facts could have a real social consequence, particularly if it stifles debate.

While ‘post-truth’ may have been the word of the year in 2016, according to the Oxford Dictionary, it could be a force for many more years to come. At Newton we like companies which produce content that is fit-for-purpose in an online world, and which have high barriers to entry in their market place.

Examples of this are companies that publish journals in the legal and medical space. These are targeted and peer-reviewed since the trust factor in those professions is huge. Lawyers do not want to go to court and cite cases that do not exist, which means they will continue to subscribe to journals that have built a reputation for reliability.

Again, our analysts are key in seeking to dig out such companies, since they are specialists in their respective sectors. Fake news and alternative facts may be a very modern development in the battle for eyes and ears but, when it comes to investing, we believe the tried-and-tested methods of analysis still stand the test of time.

[1] TrendLabs: ‘Fake news and cyber propaganda: The use and abuse of social media’, 13 June 2017

[2] Singapore Star: ‘Singapore aims to tackle fake news’, 20 June 2017

[3] ResearchLive: UK public expects social media companies to do more to tackle fake news’, 1 June 2017

[4] Singapore Star: ‘Singapore aims to tackle fake news’, 20 June 2017

This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only. Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell this security, country or sector. Please note that strategy holdings and positioning are subject to change without notice.

Important information

This is a financial promotion. Material in this publication is for general information only. The opinions expressed in this document are those of Newton and should not be construed as investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security or commodity. Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. You should consult your advisor to determine whether any particular investment strategy is appropriate. This material is for institutional investors only.

‘Newton’ and/or the “Newton Investment Management” brand refers to the following group of affiliated companies: Newton Investment Management Limited and Newton Investment Management (North America) Limited (NIMNA Ltd). In the UK, NIMNA Ltd is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the conduct of investment business and is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation. Registered in England no. 2675952. NIMNA Ltd is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. NIMNA Ltd’s investment business is described in Form ADV, Part 1 and 2, which can be obtained from the SEC.gov website or obtained upon request.

Personnel of certain of our BNY Mellon affiliates may act as: (i) registered representatives of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered broker-dealer) to offer securities, (ii) officers of the Bank of New York Mellon (a New York chartered bank) to offer bank-maintained collective investment funds, and (iii) Associated Persons of BNY Mellon Securities Corporation (in its capacity as a registered investment adviser) to offer separately managed accounts managed by BNY Mellon Investment Management firms, including NIMNA Ltd.

Certain information contained herein is based on outside sources believed to be reliable, but their accuracy is not guaranteed. Unless you are notified to the contrary, the products and services mentioned are not insured by the FDIC (or by any governmental entity) and are not guaranteed by or obligations of The Bank of New York or any of its affiliates. The Bank of New York assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the above data and disclaims all expressed or implied warranties in connection therewith. © 2006 The Bank of New York Company, Inc. All rights reserved.

Share