The United Kingdom government’s triggering of Article 50 is undoubtedly a milestone of historic significance, but it is only the start of the next stage of the process by which the UK and the European Union (EU) thrash out the terms of their ‘divorce’.

There is a huge sum of money at stake and while the UK is demanding the ‘à la carte’ option of picking and choosing what it wants from the negotiations, the EU is sticking rigidly to a set menu of fixed options.

In some ways, the match-up of the two key protagonists, UK Prime Minister Theresa May and the EU’s Brexit negotiator-in-chief Michel Barnier, is akin to the recent high-profile boxing bout between David Haye and Tony Bellew.


Some of the similarities are striking:


  • It will be a heavyweight contest.
  • It is likely to be fairly brutal, and go the distance.
  • Once the process is confirmed, we can expect lots of ‘trash talk’ from both sides. Indeed, it has already started: “The UK will get hurt” versus “No deal is better than a bad deal” being recent examples.
  • There will be a big purse up for grabs (likely to be €60bn or £50bn, according to EU president Jean-Claude Juncker). A key question is what the UK will still be asked to contribute financially, and what financial benefits it may or may not be still entitled to. The UK will probably feel it should continue to participate in a share of any profits received by the EU while it is still a member, especially if it continues to meet its commitments over that time frame.
  • It might look like a mismatch at first – one country versus 27. The UK corner might be hoping that cracks soon start to appear in the 27 EU members’ defence, however.
  • Europhiles will be hoping May’s corner throw in the towel before the end.
  • One can only hope that, after all the rancour and aggression, the process ends with a display of mutual respect.


There remains a great deal we still don’t know about how transitioning arrangements will play out. Questions over European passporting, whether new trade agreements will be in place in time, and haggling over industry-specific cooperation, such as Anglo-French fishing rights, are all still up for debate. The initial stance from the EU is likely to be a show of absolute solidarity between the 27 member states and a firm message of “you can’t have your cake and eat it” to the UK. It is in its interests to make the remaining member states believe that the UK will be worse off outside the union.

As far as the UK gilts market is concerned, this milestone has been signposted for some time. We see no rational reason why the triggering of Article 50 should be a genuine shock which causes sterling to sell off and gilt yields to collapse, although we would expect more volatility ahead. Overall though, gilts have remained highly correlated with other major government bond markets since the vote for Brexit last summer.

To us, it seems likely that currency markets will be where most of the action will play out. Sterling is likely to take a few blows as the trade and current-account deficits start to weigh more heavily as negotiations continue. But depending on how acrimonious the fight becomes, and how (dis)united the EU-27 appear, the euro too may not emerge from the contest unscathed.



Your email address will not be published.

Newton does not capture and store any personal information about an individual who accesses this blog, except where he or she volunteers such information, whether via email, an electronic form or other means. Where personal information is supplied, it will be used only in relation to this blog, and will not be collected or stored for any other purpose. Comments submitted via the blog are moderated, and, as a result, there may be a delay before they are posted.

Any reference to a specific security, country or sector should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell investments in those countries or sectors.